Difference between revisions of "project09:Prototyping"
From 100ybp
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<div style="float:left; width: 158px; height 30px; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin-right:10px; margin-bottom:10px;" align="center"> | <div style="float:left; width: 158px; height 30px; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin-right:10px; margin-bottom:10px;" align="center"> | ||
[[Project09:Presentations|'''Presentations''']] | [[Project09:Presentations|'''Presentations''']] | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <div style="float:left; width: 158px; height 30px; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin-right:10px; margin-bottom:10px;" align="center"> | ||
| + | [[Project09:Workshops|'''Workshops''']] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 16:04, 28 December 2019
Node
In a workshop which I did with Erik Bakker in the robotic building studio we developed a design process for a steel 3D-printed structural node. The aim was to develop a generic design process applicable to different structural situations in which a node is created by means of topological optimization. In order to develop the process we used a situation from Erik’s design during the workshop, to later apply it in my own project. The elaboration of the node in my project is further explained here.
In the situation two beams cross each other with an offset, which need to be structurally connected. This will be done by the node that is to be designed, which will be attached to the beams by the use of bolts. These bolts are used as loads and supports in a topological optimization process. The process is subdivided in eight different conditions: normal forces, shear forces, moment forces and orthogonal forces, for both beams respectively, with the other beam’s bolts acting as supports. This is done to ensure all forces are covered by the node. The forces are received from structural analysis of the whole construction.
In the situation a bounding volume is appointed in which the node can develop. From this volume voids are cut for reasons of assembly and neighbouring beams. With the use of a plug-in for grasshopper in Rhino called tOpos, the volume is divided in voxels which are iteratively removed according to structural relevance. Subsequently, the resulting voxels are collected and wrapped in geometry. This geometry is then fine-tuned and the holes for the bolts are ensured.
The resulting geometry represents a boundary within which it is most efficient to use material. The next optimization step would be to determine the internal porosity of this geometry. This would be done taking into consideration the requirements of the printer that would be used (which might slightly affect the overall geometry as well). Those requirements include maximum overhang angle, type of supporting material and layer height.
